Choosing between Claude Sonnet 4.6 (Anthropic) and GPT-5.5 (OpenAI)? This is a side-by-side of their API pricing, context windows, and real cost on a sample workload — so you can pick on the numbers, not the marketing.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-5.5: pricing & specs
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | GPT-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Input / 1M tokens | $3.00 | $5.00 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $15.00 | $30.00 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.30 | $0.50 |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 400K tokens |
Cost example: 1M input + 1M output tokens
For a workload of 1M input plus 1M output tokens, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $18.00 and GPT-5.5 costs $35.00 — Claude Sonnet 4.6 is about 49% cheaper on this mix. Your real ratio of input to output tokens shifts the math; plug in your own numbers with the token cost calculator.
Which should you choose?
- Lower cost: Claude Sonnet 4.6 is cheaper on output tokens ($15.00 vs $30.00 / 1M), which usually dominates spend on generation-heavy workloads.
- Larger context window: GPT-5.5 fits more in one prompt (400K tokens) — better for long documents or big RAG context.
- Ecosystem: pick the provider whose SDK, rate limits, and tooling fit your stack — see Anthropic rate limits and OpenAI rate limits.
Full specs: Claude Sonnet 4.6 · GPT-5.5. Thinking of switching providers? See the migration guides.
Prices as of June 2026 and change often — verify before relying on them.